Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoxTorrents.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was kept No consensus Pegasus1138 Talk 02:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

BoxTorrents.com
Preivously prodded by who cited WP:WEB concerns and advertising. Looks like blatant advertising to me as well. Traffic ranking (12,000) does not meet the 10,000 requirement and I couldn't find any mention of it by a media organization. Hbdragon88 07:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom 213.42.21.76 08:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep iff cleaned up. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-22 08:47Z 
 * Delete per nom. --Coredesat 08:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable and advertising. The fact that the bulk of the article is defining standard BitTorrent concepts (not BoxTorrent-specific) doesn't help either. Paddles TC 12:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Water-thin keep if cleaned up and npov'd, but that probably won't happen. --Mincetro 12:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Alexa cut-off point is actually 100,000 + cleanup tag to be added. Tyrenius 17:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Huh, when I asked about it on another AFD, I was told that it was 10,000 or better. Hbdragon88 19:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This is clearly an Ad to me, even with a thank you note added by the original author. Besides, introducing and linking to sites which is likely to host copyvio materials may get Wikipedia in trouble. I don't want Wikipedia being accused an accomplice of DMCA violation. --WinHunter (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Week keep, notable only as a file-leech site. Voice of Treason 19:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Passes WP:WEB but reads like an ad. --Danielrocks123 talk  contribs 00:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, advertising. --Musicpvm 05:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.