Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Box Critters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Hog Farm Talk 15:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Box Critters

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non-notable game, no coverage or reviews that establish notability CUPIDICAE💕  19:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not delete my article. I worked really hard on it and it is my first article I ever made or spent all my time on. The game the article is based on a new game however it does have a cult following. The game is very notable in how you get to see every new update and see how the game is growing from a one room area to a place that could hold up to Club Penguin if u just give it time. And if the game ever takes off and gets more popular I would want people to be able to look at my article and learned how it started. I am working on this article everyday and I don't want all my hard work to go to waste. So please i'm begging you do not delete it! Also I just want to know why is my article being nominated anyway. All the reasons I'm getting is kinda vaig. So can you tell me what i and doing wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LittleMAHER1 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Move back to draft until GNG-worthy sources arise and are added to the article. BD2412  T 21:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

ok I did. Do I remove the warning that is on the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by LittleMAHER1 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Draft space is not meant to hold non notable topics indefinitely. Considering it's been three years since this release, there's no indication that it will be notable nor that it is now. And it was repeatedly move warred into mainspace, which is why we are here now. CUPIDICAE💕  16:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

-- Box Critters has a growing community, it doesn't have much sources so it would need to be sent back to draft but it's still a relevent and significant article. I can fix some of the issues myself but I don't see why the article should be deleted only to be recreated in a few months once the game gains media gravity.
 * Return to Draft until multiple issues are fixed incl sources and wording. PascalsCalculatingHamster (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

I have updated and added many sources to the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by LittleMAHER1 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Draftify Theres already a functioning Fandom-Wikia page on this, and this article copies that style. Wikipedia is not a game manual, and this game has not been proven to be notable yet. As well, everything below the lead is unsourced/poorly sourced and WP:FANCRUFT. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 01:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

the only reason why there is no sources is because whenever I put sources they keep taking them down. Ik having a source that redirects to Twitter may not look good however that is where 90% of Box Critters news comes from. And I dont see how it would be un reliable if it was the creator of there own game. That's like not being allowed to make your own game or show. Also something I found out, why does Flip the Frog have there own article? He isn't a notable character. And its not a game manual. I am just giving info on this new game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LittleMAHER1 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * RocketSnail's Twitter is not verified, and therefore is an unreliable source. To cite Twitter, the account must be verified. This rule is in place because otherwise, people could tweet stuff from their personal Twitter account and cite it on Wikipedia. That’s why only verified Twitter accounts are allowed. I’ll look into the other article as well. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 16:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify pr alternatively delete per above. Also WP:TNT: Lots of trivial information that is unlikely to pass WP:GAMECRUFT or sourceable through reliable sources. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 20:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.