Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Box Elder (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  15:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Box Elder (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability asserted; editor has no other substantial edits apart from this article, which may indicate a COI. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 23:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete NN film. Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 02:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This site demonstrates that the film is at least marginally serious. While IMDB does not itself demonstrate sufficient notability, I feel the links, references, and critical response section I added to the article demonstrate sufficient notability for inclusion, as do these two reviews / interviews. I find no legitimate reason for deletion. -FrankTobia (talk) 03:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 04:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This film has nationwide, independent distribution as evidenced by it's screening at the |Gene Siskel Film Center among numerous other theatrical engagements in the last 3 months. Reviews added which provide evidence of national film critics. Murtis (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep the article's sources demonstrate multiple reviews from around the united states.Grey Wanderer | Talk 05:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.