Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Box Ghost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  20:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Box Ghost

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a non notable ghost in a fictional show. It was tagged for several problems, but the tags were removed by 69.251.255.170. However, it does not pass notability standards and cannot be cited by independent secondary reliable sources. In fact, it is not cited at all. Pilotbob 03:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC) Pilotbob 03:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Although it's not sourced, it is a character in a Nickelodeon show. Good formatting and nicely laid out. BeanoJosh 04:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FICT. No secondary sources to establish notability. Doctorfluffy 04:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Qst  17:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Insufficiently notable fictional character. No coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources. -- Satori Son 17:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources. A non-notable fictional charactor.  Reywas92 Talk 18:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As mentioned, there are no reliable sources given, and indeed, even a general Google search shows the only resut for 'Box Ghost' is this article, but many results for "Ghost Box", which would make me think this is truly a non-notable fictional entity, and could easily be incorporated into the Danny Phantom article. The article itself acknowledges that this entity is "serving mostly as a cameo", so I do not think it warrants an entire article on its cameo appearances. Ariel  ♥  Gold  17:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 20:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.