Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxing' Joe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  01:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Boxing' Joe
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:HOAX: unreferenced, can find nothing about it online, maintenance tags repeatedly removed. MuffledThud (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —MuffledThud (talk) 17:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. If its a movie that's going to be released in 2009, as the article states (that is to say, within a month and a half, minimum) and had those celebs/people in it, there would probably be something on Google, but I can't find anything pertaining to this movie.  Even if it's not a hoax (though it seems like it probably is), the lack of other coverage would start to shift into WP:CRYSTAL (unreleased) territory or other issues.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  19:41, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 22:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant hoax. Considering the "names" claimed to be involved, there would be something written about this somewheres... and there isn't. After a diligent search, it seems like a CSD:G3 to me.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Although Friedberg and Seltzer crank out awful movies pretty fast, even if this was a factual article no studio ever releases a film like this so late in the year (F&S films are usually out between February and April). This sounds like a pretty obvious hoax, and somehow they would 'creatively' title this Boxing Movie instead. The creating editor's history is also filled with speedies and successful AfD's all over the place.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a blatant hoax.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 18:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.