Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxing at the 2015 European Games – Men's 64 kg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games (non-admin closure). clpo13(talk) 15:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Boxing at the 2015 European Games – Men's 64 kg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. Content could be expanded one day, like some of the other events.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the previous European Games have an expansion for boxing results which I think is proper.  Wikipedia is not supposed to be result listing so although a case can be made for higher level competitions I don't think the European Games for Boxing is.  It looks like all these sub-articles were created with the intention of expansion which never happened.  I see that there were several other AfDs which should have been grouped and several sub-articles that were expanded that were not sent to AfD - I think the latter should be sent to AfD eventually but I want to see how these play out first.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * "None of the previous European Games have an expansion for boxing results" - that's because there are none, as this is the first European Games! other results have been completed, these ones haven't. For now. There's also lots of incoming links to these individual tournaments for nations/competitors and they all have the possibility of being expanded.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Point taken (I was confused by the European Boxing Championships). I still stand by my comment that competition trees for every weight class for every competition is not necessary.  For what I think is a comparable example Articles for deletion/2014 Asian Wrestling Championships – Men's freestyle 57 kg.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, otherwise redirect: I agree with . Notable event. Many secondary sources (see here. Most of the elite events at the European Games have these sub pages, see Category:Sports at the 2015 European Games. Also many incoming links. Only if someone can show that a page of a red link is earlier created than when it is a redirect, deleting could make sense. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 10:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect as not independently notable. SwisterTwister   talk  04:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Please note that most of this series was closed already as Redirect - I think the closing admin missed two.  (see Articles for deletion/Boxing at the 2015 European Games – Women's 60 kg.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * And has now been relisted! So we'll have another 7 days of nothing, meaning that one month since the listing started, no-one applied common-sense and was just bold enough to redirect it in the first place.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Omni Flames  ( talk   contribs ) 06:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.