Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoycottAdvance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. I'm ignoring Schmucky's comment because software can't be speedied. Joe Chill (talk) 14:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

BoycottAdvance

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete all product articles with no third party sources. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Covered at some length in this book. Also mentioned in another. The software seems to be known for a quite while in the community, 2001 interview with the main developer. Pcap ping  17:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * According to that book, and also to armchairarcade.com (a site with professional staff) it's one of the top two choices for GBA emulation, and rated as little better than the competitor VisualBoyAdvance. Pcap ping  18:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Discussion in the book seems persuasive to me that at least some external sources view this as notable. Nandesuka (talk) 03:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Despite the number of articles about emulators that make their way to AfD, this goes to show that it is possible for this kind of software to meet our notability guidelines. Good find; keep. Marasmusine (talk) 12:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.