Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boys & Maughan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Boys & Maughan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD, Non Notable local law firm, lacks significant coverage so does not pass WP:GNG or WP:CORP

Mt king  (edits)  09:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Boys & Maughan fails WP:CORP. A Google News Archive search for "Boys & Maughan" returns only passing mentions. Similarly, a Google Books search for "Boys & Maughan" returns only passing mentions—directory-type entries. Also interesting to note is that their "about us" page refers the reader to Wikipedia for more information:"... The firm has at various times practised in Folkestone, Sandwich, Cliftonville and Canterbury. It is now represented in Margate, Birchington, Broadstairs and Ramsgate. More information can be found on our Wikipedia page."
 * Goodvac (talk) 23:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Note that I've copyedited the article to cut out all the unreferenced woffle. There's nothing notable about the firm itself. It should find another means of advertising. —S MALL  JIM   15:31, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability. --Cox wasan (talk) 18:27, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.