Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boytjie points


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   already deleted. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Boytjie points

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable neologism coined on an apparently non-notable blog, apparently added to Wikipedia by the blog owner. Beloved Freak  17:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. Yet another case of why we need an "unambiguous WP:NOT violation" CSD criteria so this kind of thing doesn't end up at AfD. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOT, WP:MADEUP. Concur that ther should be a speedy for this. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:43, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable neologism. Only seen on one blog.  I wanted to speedy this but there isn't a category for it.  I don't see why A7 couldn't be expanded to also apply to neologisms. Dac04 (talk) 19:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOT and WP:GNG. Sorting out whether a neologism is notable enough for inclusion is not really something a CSD should do, unless the article includes hoax level statements. Monty  845  19:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting delete.svg Speedy delete as a blatant hoax (G3). → Σ ⚑   ☭  07:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.