Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brændstrup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  09:22, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Brændstrup

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:GNG. Doesnt appear to have sister article in Danish Wikipedia which sets alarm bells off. Unsourced since 2006. Coin945 (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - It looks like a real distinct population center to me.  Not having an WP article in the language of the location of the topic is not grounds for deletion.  I recently created one for a Greek topic that doesn't have an article in Greek WP. --Oakshade (talk) 06:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND and well established precedent per WP:PLACEOUTCOMES: populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable, and the village is located here: 55.33052°N, 9.05685°W. I have cleaned up the article and added a few sources. The village does not have an article on Danish Wikipedia, that's correct, but looking at the list of place names mentioned in da:Rødding Sogn (Vejen Kommune), and Brændstrup is among them, it's obvious that creating stubs for small villages isn't the first priority on da.wp. Sam Sailor 20:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - as per .  Onel 5969  TT me 14:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.