Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Br55


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''delete. This is a non-notable weapon within a video game.''' Natalie 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Br55

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Article is extensively a game guide, not a description of fictional weapon Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russian Spetsnaz (talk • contribs) 2007/10/18 07:57:57
 * I got rid of the tactics for ... sections. It doesn't seem to be much of a game guide now. Don't delete. Σ psilon60198  "Σ" is a Sigma.  "ε" is an Epsilon. ( Talk  §  E-Mail ) 03:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 21:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - many sections ("advantages", "Disadvantages" et al.) are still like a game guide, much of it is in universe, but in theory could be fixed. --Thinboy00 talk/contribs 22:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete or merge and redirect - The article is still game guide like, but information on this belongs on the Halo wiki or in a list, not on its own. It is not notable enough outside, or even possibly within, the "Halo universe",  to have its own article. SmileToday☺(talk to me, My edits) 02:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It reads like an in-universe guide, not an objective article. &mdash;ScouterSig 15:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:OR. Also doubtful there are reliable secondary sources to show notability. Doctorfluffy 01:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.