Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braam Hanekom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to PASSOP. m.o.p 05:01, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Braam Hanekom

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Hardly meets WP:ANYBIO. Created by User:Refugeeadvocacy, very likely in a conflict of interest. bender235 (talk) 11:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * WP:ANYBIO only comes into play if the subject doesn't pass WP:BIO. Could the nominator please explain how the sources in the article and found by clicking on the word "news" in the nomination fail to demonstrate a pass of those criteria? I must also point out that, per WP:AGF, we shouldn't be guessing about an author's motives for creating an article, and, even if there was a conflict of interest, that wouldn't be a valid reason for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to PASSOP. The vast majority of sources in this article are either broken links, unreliable sources, or don't even mention Hanekom once.  Don't think he passes the notability bar.  &mdash;SW&mdash; gossip 18:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


 * It is clear that he is well known, please look at talk comments over thirty thousand google results and several news results. Unfounded nomination for deletion.


 * He is found everywhere on the web can someone explain why there is a problem with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.112.79 (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * links working now? So whats wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.112.79 (talk) 18:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * It seems he is extensively quoted and has received many awards, should remain on wikipedia.41.133.113.22 (talk) 06:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * "keep" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.113.22 (talk) 06:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.