Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bracell Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sateri. There is certainly agreement that the page has to go, but not clear whether a merger, a redirect or a deletion is warranted. Going by middle road as there is no explicit consensus for any outcome other than for removing the page. Material may be merged over at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Bracell Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Routine company. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP.  scope_creep Talk  11:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   14:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to get more comments and !votes
 * Delete without prejudice - it's been long enough and sources haven't shown up. This is just press-release quality though - David Gerard (talk) 08:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Sateri in lieu of deletion. Sateri notes, "Sateri’s VSF operations were privatised and separated from the listed company[10] and was renamed Bracell Limited in February 2015.[11]" Cunard (talk) 01:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  12:02, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. As above, I'm not sure how this has been relisted twice. No RS sources have been added and it fails WP:NCORP. Even if sources were added, it still appears to be an "advert" for a business.  - Funky Snack  ( Talk ) 12:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Would need a significant rewrite to not be an advertisement, not enough sources. --XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 12:48, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment It is weird to run a back-to-back Afd along with Articles for deletion/Sateri for parallel articles. According to the Hong Kong Companies Registry, Bracell Limited, a Bermuda-incorporated offshore company, which also "secondary" registered in Hong Kong as a listed company and holding company, was formerly known as "Sateri Holdings Limited". Since "Sateri" and "Bracell" are basically the same, i would say merge the two parallel articles (or turn to redirect and tag Template:Redirect with history or whatever relevant tag). I am undecided on which WP:article titles are more relevant. Since new official name of former listed company (after privatization), usually less commonly appeared in the media than the former official name (i.e. the former official name are WP:common name). I will comment the keep/deletion of the company on notability ground on Articles for deletion/Sateri instead. Matthew hk (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge with Sateri per . It is notable as a former publicly traded company with annual revenue exceeding US$1 billion. -Zanhe (talk) 04:51, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge with Sateri per and Zanhe   Lubbad85   (☎) 13:06, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.