Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Brock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:30, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Brad Brock

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

I did a google search for Brad Brock, and I can't find any reliable sources on him. It seems as though he does not pass our WP:BLP, WP:MUSICBIO or WP:ENTERTAINER policies. --Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 05:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC) - I think you mean WP:BIO. – ukexpat (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete . As per nominator, not notable. Off2riorob (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Exactly, this person is just a local only singer in the South Florida region whose record sales are non-verifiable and he has yet to sign on to a reputable record label and gain notoriety with the U.S. or even the world. I believe that such a person would not otherwise make it into a paper bound encyclopedia; therefore, I don't personally believe the entry can stand within wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.170.142.8 (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Clearly fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSICBIO ukexpat (talk) 22:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- ukexpat (talk) 22:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apparently fails WP:GNG -I am happy to change my !vote if reliable sources come out. -- Cycl o pia talk  02:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete for now. Maybe he can be included in the future when has reached Wikipedia notability standards. Ludlom (talk) 17:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.