Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Jan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Brad Jan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a model, whose claim of notability is referenced almost entirely to primary sources and blogs that cannot support notability at all. Of the seven footnotes here, literally the only one that represents a reliable source is literally a 40-word (I counted) blurb introducing a YouTube video, which means it's not substantive coverage of him either. Nothing here passes our subject-specific inclusion criteria for models, and the sourcing isn't even close to getting him past WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete My searches have not turned up substantial independent coverage in reliable sources. SmartSE (talk) 20:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of secondary sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.