Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Peters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 09:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Brad Peters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and GNG - whole article sourced to one document whose provenance is entirely unclear. Spartaz Humbug! 08:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No real claim for passing WP:PORNBIO. Even if you count Manshots as a reliable source, it can't satisfy WP:GNG all by itself. Searches for reliable sources get unrelated people and a Find a Grave posting. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I received notification that this article had been marked for deletion because I was the one who started it in June 2010. (Luckily the L.A. Times had an article on the View Park neighborhood today and I logged in to Wikipedia to check if anything in it could be used in the Wiki entry, otherwise it could have been weeks before I found out.) In defense of keeping the article: he appeared in 15 movies during the 1980s. Additional observations, which probably don't hold much weight in this argument:
 * It's been on Wikipedia for 5 years
 * It had been tagged as within the scope of WikiProject Biography
 * It had been tagged as within the scope of WikiProject Pornography
 * If it does end up being deleted, please at least send me a note explaining why 15 titles is not a high enough threshold for a porn star's bio to be on Wikipeida. Inconsistency in article acceptability is the reason I've pared back the amount of time I spend in contributing to Wikipedia. DL77 (talk) 18:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Performing in X number of films does not establish notability for porn actors. That criterion was excluded from PORNBIO many years ago. Film database entries like the link you posted above don't establish notability either. They are not considered significant reliable source coverage. As for the article being on Wikipedia for 5 years, I don't see how it satisfied inclusion guidelines back in 2010 and the guidelines have been tightened since then. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - none of the reasons set forth by DL77 show notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.