Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Swancott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Although the player fails NFOOTBALL, the consensus is that the present sources are giving enough in-depth coverage to make the subject pass general GNG criteria (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 Need any help? 00:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Brad Swancott

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:GNG and WPNFOOTBALL. Simione001 (talk) 22:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Non notable player. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: Obviously fails NFOOTBALL. As for GNG, there do appear to be a number of in-depth articles about this player online (in addition to featuring heavily in a number of others about transfers, match reports etc.):
 * NPL: Brad Swancott within reach of memorable farewell with Lambton Jaffas
 * Ornithology lesson or swansong?
 * Brad Swancott aims to channel veteran goalkeeper Bob Catlin
 * Keeper Swancott saving time
 * The brief responses above make it unclear whether the other contributors have considered such sources at all. Macosal (talk) 00:18, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - more than one source addressing him directly and in sufficient detail to pass WP:GNG, which supersedes NFOOTBALL. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 03:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:GNG, Newcastle, New South Wales is a populous enough area for its local media to be reliable. Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep newcastle herald refs look enough for GNG. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 15:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.