Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Voth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KaisaL (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Brad Voth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable figure in hockey.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Does not meet seem to meet NHOCKEY although this states that he was "Captain for the South team for the 'All-Star Spectacular,'" which is not necessarily the same as a First Team All-Star per criterion #4 but not sure if the EIHL has the equivalent of such an honor. But he seems to have attracted a good amount of attention and coverage at Cardiff.  This article is ostensibly about a particular incident Voth was involved in but also goes into significant detail about Voth himself.  The BBC saw fit to give a short article about the retirement of his number.  There is other coverage from WalesOnline such as this and this.  The suspension he received in 2011 got some coverage in various British sources, albeit not really coverage of Voth himself.  But he seems to have attracted enough attention beyond the typical player in a league that we assess in WP:NHOCKEY/LA as a lower level league such that keeping seems appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  21:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG, whether or not he passes WP:NHOCKEY. Rlendog has cited three sources (from 2008, 2013 and 2016) which look WP:RS, are from different sites, and are specifically about him. Narky Blert (talk) 21:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per Rlendog's sources & research. Ejgreen77 (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.