Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Wassink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Brad Wassink

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor former appointed state official fails to rise to the level of WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. The sourcing also doesn't hold up--it's almost all primary, written by the subject, or directory-type stuff that doesn't verify the information given and doesn't indicate encyclopedic notability for the article subject. Marquardtika (talk) 20:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Delete Subject is a very minor former appointed official and doesn't meet WP:NPOL, no real secondary sources establishing notability either. GPL93 (talk) 00:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty much noone below the actual secretary level is notable in sub-national unit governments. When you are both assistant and depty it is rare indeed to be notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:48, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per John Pack Lambert and WP:NPOL. Risker (talk) 03:21, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject has not held any political office that constitutes an automatic WP:NPOL pass just because he exists — he could get in the door if he was properly referenced to enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG, but the referencing here is virtually all primary sourcing that cannot support notability at all — and the only footnote that's actually citing a media outlet is an article where he's the bylined author, not the subject, so it's not contributing anything either. Bearcat (talk) 04:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.