Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braden Mitchell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draft:Braden Mitchell. I went ahead and moved the article to Draft:Braden Mitchell. Thanks everyone for contributing and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Braden Mitchell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMOTORSPORT. Only sources cited are press releases that do not establish notability. An external search did not find meaningful WP:SIGCOV.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 20:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 20:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsports-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 20:09, 9 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Cavanaughs expanded the article with some useful information and reliable sources.  NASCARfan0548  ↗  23:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Those "reliable sources" are press releases, which aren't considered WP:RS.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 05:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Make it a draft, I think what's on there (the sources I found) can be kept, but I agree that there really isn't enough info about him on the page. Nothing else could be found because there's nothing else out there online about him when Googling. Mitchell has only ever attempted one race which was a DNQ. The racing series he competes in is so small that there's no news about him. If Mitchell attempts a Nascar race again (like Eldora in 2020) or whenever we find out more info about him, then I'd say add the page back. Moving it as a draft would be a good compromise here. We don't lose any of the existing info, which is still something but not enough for an article. Cavanaughs (talk) 04:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Cavanaughs
 * Draftify per Cavanaughs reasoning. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: I just added a reference to a reliable source to make the AfD more likely say "keep".  NASCARfan0548  ↗  04:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The source is directory-style sourcing that does not demonstrate WP:SIGCOV.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.