Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Field

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:31, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Bradley Field
Vanity, though probably more of an attack ad. RickK 05:41, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. -- RHaworth 06:08, 2005 Feb 5 (UTC)
 * Delete. Listed for speedy twice after he removed it the first time.. no redeeming conent at all. -Goldom 06:11, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I reverted the "attack" portion, as it was entered by a different anon than the article's creator.  Even so, as Goldom says, the original is vanity without redeeming content.  SWAdair | Talk  11:12, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Obvious vanity. Inter 11:29, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough yet. Thue | talk 21:13, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Extreme Delete then, as blatant vanity. Wyss 21:58, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 02:36, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. ComCat.
 * Obviously the person "Bradley Field" doesn't merit an article, but someone might search for that phrase, looking for information on Bradley International Airport. I used to live near there and often heard it called "Bradley Field."  Anyone object to a redirect?  JamesMLane 07:41, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:30, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.