Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley M. Faircloth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   15:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Bradley M. Faircloth

 * Delete Being KIA in Iraq is not grounds enough for notability. Not every Soldier or Marine killed deserves their own page here.--Looper5920 12:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - am moving deletion tag to the article page, where it belongs. Personally have no real opinion one way or another about the notability of the subject.  Badbilltucker 16:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak delete requires a secondary reference to substantiate notability. Addhoc 13:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being killed in action is not sufficient grounds for inclusion. Millions of people were killed in action in WWI and WWII and we certainly can't give all of them an article. Wikipedia is not a memorial. -- Necrothesp 14:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - tragic but not notable. Nuttah68 21:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.