Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Stoke Town FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Bradley Stoke Town FC

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Procedural nomination. This article was originally PRODed as it has yet to play above level 17 of the English football league system (the currently accepted criertia is playing at level 10, or having played in the FA Cup). The PROD was removed by the article creator with the rationale "Deleted the concern that the club hasn't played above level 17 of the English League System because the club is rapidly progressing up the league system, aiming to become a semi professional club".  Bettia  (talk)  11:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - club clearly isn't notable at the present time, and a further seven promotions aren't realistically going to happen any time soon..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.  Bettia  (talk)  13:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. This a clearly non-notable club. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - They've played too far down the pyramid - and have never played in any of the tournaments that grant notability - to be considered notable. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  23:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete – As a resident of Bradley Stoke it's good to see my local team here, but they clearly don't pass either WP:FOOTY's level 10 criterion, or WP:GNG. Hopefully they'll reach a high enough level to earn a place here soon, but it's at least a few years away yet. &mdash; Gasheadsteve Talk to me 07:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not close to being notable at this moment in time due to lack of coverage and lack of participation in national competitions.  Big  Dom  16:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above. GiantSnowman 19:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.