Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braemar Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to School District 44 North Vancouver. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Braemar Elementary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

School through grade 7. Convention with such schools is (I understand) to delete and/or redirect. Appears to be non-notable. Zero refs here, and thus zero RS-supported text to consider merging. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Tagged for lack of refs for over 2 years. Epeefleche (talk) 19:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to School District 44 North Vancouver, per the lack of sourcing. NLinpublic (talk) 19:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * delete - cannot see the point in redirecting to an unreferenced nd poss copyvio list. Fmph (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't  see any clear evidence of Copyvio on  that  page. Please provide diffs or a Duplication Detector report. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Fmph, if you are suggesting that School District 44 North Vancouver is possibly copyvio, there is other evidence that this school belongs to that district, so I don't see any problems with a redirect. NLinpublic (talk) 19:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect as per usual practice for elementary schools. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to School District 44 North Vancouver as per usual practice based on precedent for primary schools. Note that  Outcomes may  be an essay  but  it  simply  documents facts as they are without  expressing  opinion, and '...is intended to supplement Wikipedia:Deletion policy'. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:GNG or current school guidelines and i don't feel redirect is worthwhile. Edinburgh  Wanderer  22:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to locality or school governing body per longstanding consensus. I'm also expressing concern with the large numbers of school nominations at the moment; it can't be expected that all editors be able to respond to this mass act of deletionist ideology. &tilde;danjel [ talk | contribs ] 00:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.