Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahman-Atman Yoga (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Rlendog (talk) 19:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Brahman-Atman Yoga
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline. Thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify the contents of the article have failed. Shannon Rose Talk 10:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 10:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 10:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 10:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 10:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I declined a G4 Speedy deletion nomination, as this does not meet the criteria (it is not substantially the same as the article deleted in 2005). However, I can find no evidence at independent, reliable sources which would indicate that this type of yoga exists - Brahman and Atman are 2 doctines of the Vedanta, but no sources refer to a form of yoga embracing both the one supreme, universal Spirit that is the origin and support of the phenomenal universe which is Brahman and the one's true self of Atman. As such, I see no evidence to show that it meets the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:46, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * delete as unreferenced. Can be recreated iff somebody provides proper references establishing WP:ORG. --dab (𒁳) 08:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.