Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrainPOP (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 04:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

BrainPOP
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Some sources are listed at the bottom, but they're all primary, trivial, or merely interviews of the creators, or don't even mention it at all. Reads like a fansite with far too much info on the characters. Only sources found in Gnews were press releases. Last AFD was way the hell back in 2005. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. BrainPOP is an educational website used in more than 25% of U.S. schools.  It receives over 6 million unique visits each month.  I have added a couple of additional refs and moved a few refs from the External Links section to in-line positions in the text.  I believe that there are sufficent references to reliable sources in the article to provide ample verifiability.  Disclosure: I have edited this article off and on in the past.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you have a reliable source for that 25% comment. Ridernyc (talk) 06:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's cited in the BrainPOP article: Newsday, February 4, 2007 "Free Animated Movies for Black History Month"  -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * While it is in a RS I don't trust the figure, have a feeling they just quoted a press release there. The numbers just don't ad up for me. Used in 25% of american schools yet it only has 6 million uniques a month. Ridernyc (talk) 15:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Well written and referenced article which clearly denotes the subject's notability. Jack1956 (talk) 07:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 13:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you even reading the sources? Tell me which of these is non-trivial, substantial, secondary coverage. Oh wait, that would be none of them. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.