Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain Slaves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Brain Slaves

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable unsigned band - fails WP:MUSIC on all counts. dramatic (talk) 20:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands_and_musicians-related deletion discussions.
 * Delete for failing WP:MUSIC. HeureusementIci (talk) 20:39, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral I'm of two minds on the external sources. The fourth is clearly trivial as a list of tour dates. The others will need to be evaluated based on issues of reputation that I don't feel comfortable doing myself. HeureusementIci (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree fails WP:MUSIC. Paste Talk 20:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * In the light of new information below, I think that I'm happy with a change to Keep. Paste Talk 09:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  20:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:MUSIC. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 00:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: band fails WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 03:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Info: Band was formerly known as The Coshercot honeys, with moderate notability with a g-search. Also referenced in: The Electric Confectionaires. I originally placed a CSD tag on this article, but have since conceded notability. -- Oliver Twisted  09:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: for above reason. -- Oliver Twisted  09:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I browsed a google search for "coshercot honeys" and wasn't immediately able to see a notability criterion fulfilled. Is there a specific one that they meet, and if so, can you help me see which? Thanks! HeureusementIci (talk) 15:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree about the lack of a rock 'em sock 'em source, but this is a New Zealand band, and seems to be mentioned fairly prominently in high traffic NZ websites, such as: The New Zealand Herald:, and others: , , . A number 1 song on BFM's Top 10 chart isn't too bad either: . -- Oliver  Twisted  (Talk)  11:27, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Update: As Brain Slaves, the band is firmly scheduled to play a major venue: -- Oliver Twisted  (Talk)  11:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * References added to article now - may meet criteria of "subject of multiple non-trivial published works". Nurg (talk) 12:02, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, article has been rescued by Nurg.- gadfium 18:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, passes WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.