Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainfork


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Redirect optional - Mailer Diablo 15:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Brainfork
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Rip off of Brainfuck, anything of importance is already there. - Hahnch e  n 17:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Deletel logical derivative of BrainFuck, easily merged into the master list with no real information loss. LinaMishima 01:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT. Whose stupid idea is it for us to have to vote on each and every one of these all over again? They were all so similar that they could hve been grouped into a table if anyone was interested in keeping. As individual entries, they are of no use to anybody. This one certainly deserves the chop. Ohconfucius 05:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * That 'stupid idea' was actually a DRv consensus. --ais523 08:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * or Redirect to brainfuck Ohconfucius 07:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Ohconfucius: multi-threaded brainfuck indeed. No refs beyond a dead web page. That should tell us all we need to know. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

--ais523 08:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Here's the past esolang AfD box (many, but not all, of these are relevant):
 * Redirect to brainfuck, already smerged. --ais523 08:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.