Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braingle

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep moink 17:14, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Braingle
Advertisement. Kelly Martin 21:47, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and expand. 141,000 Google hits is pretty good. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  22:14, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep those are a lot of its Yuckfoo 01:21, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Neutral. Send to cleanup; delete if it doesn't get expansion and a POV-ectomy within a reasonable timeframe. Current contents not particularly encyclopedic. Niteowlneils 04:05, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: link spam. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:36, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup and expands. Appears notable. Megan1967 07:54, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. I rewrote the article a bit to have a more encyclopedic tone. I am not sure that it helped or not. Zzyzx11 | Talk 05:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Might be notable, but it still smacks of advertising IMO. --Jemiller226 06:27, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Gemini531 04:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Clean or Boot. I also agree with Jemiller226 but i also think, if this is NOT cleaned, it should be deleted. --


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.