Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainomaniac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Brainomaniac

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film. No indications of any significant coverage anywhere. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    16:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    16:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete due to lack of notability since I cannot find even a passing mention of this film in reliable sources. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 17:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Very little through WP:INDAFD - title Brainomaniac, director "Pronil Halder", studio Artwood


 * Delete this brand new article per failing WP:NF. While Art Wood studio may have some limited notability, this film does not. As it was released just last August, this could change, and IF it does, the tweaked article can be undeleted and properly sourced.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 10:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Reading the description of the film at its Youtube page, it's clear this film is not intended as a commercial release. All the more reason that it doesn't pass WP:NF. —C.Fred (talk) 13:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't delete this film may not have a global notability till now but the view statistics given over internet on this film for a month, it is quite impressive. So it is clear that this film is rapidly coming into the notice of people. _ Arka 14:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)  has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. Drm310 (talk) 15:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep the article I have seen this film many times and this film has become enough famous especially in India so I would recomment to keep this article. Kachu Mukherjee 14:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.187.48.142 (talk)
 * @ Kachu Mukherjee: Your seeing it many times is fine, but not a notability... however as the film is in Bengali, perhaps you can offer Bengali spelling and Bengali language sources speaking toward the film. Under WP:NONENG they would be acceptable and would go far in supporting your assertion that it has become "famous". Thanks,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable film; creator has WP:COI. --Drm310 (talk) 16:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can find nothing to show that this film passes notability guidelines as a whole. I wish the director well, but this just doesn't pass notability guidelines at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability, per Notability (films). &mdash; Cirt (talk) 09:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.