Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braintwist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect. Petros471 16:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Braintwist
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 17:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Rip off of Brainfuck, anything of importance is already there. - Hahnch e  n 17:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Whilst innovative, it is as easily merged as brainFork LinaMishima 01:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Brainfork  As an individual entry, this is of no use to anybody. Ohconfucius 05:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * or Redirect to brainfuck Ohconfucius 07:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

--ais523 08:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Here's the past esolang AfD box (many, but not all, of these are relevant):
 * Redirect to brainfuck, already smerged. --ais523 08:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect to brainfuck --Unitedroad 07:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my rationale at Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 20:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable, just a derivative of brainfuck. Equendil Talk 00:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Brainfuck. I have added a bit more to its entry there. Bridgeplayer 02:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Brainfuck as a member of its language family. &mdash; Tobias Bergemann 14:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Brainfuck,  Tewfik Talk 19:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Brainfuck. -- Satori Son 01:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.