Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bramley School & Nursery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Walton-on-the-Hill. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 15:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Bramley School & Nursery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's simply not notable. There are 4 cited sources; two are directory type listings. One is a routine inspection report by the responsible authority and finally the school's own website. No press or any other independent reliable sources that prove notability. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * delete as it is only a primary school, which not of itself considered notable. Mangoe (talk) 22:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Walton-on-the-Hill per long-standing precedent stated at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  01:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Walton-on-the-Hill per concensus for non-notable primary/junior schools. Philg88 ♦talk 14:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect as above. If it ever has inherent notability it may come back, after all. Fiddle   Faddle  08:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per the generally accepted guidelines per Davey2010 et al. Bellerophon talk to me  20:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.