Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branch (graph theory)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:15, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Branch (graph theory)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Long standing unreferenced tag. The article has '(Graph theory)' in the title but the lead sentence says it's about mathematical logic. I searched for references for graph theory meaning and found "branch set" which is something else. Reference for AD+ formerly given under see also has 'branch' but a different definition. Little context given in the article so it's difficult to carry on. If subject is notable then a complete rewrite seems necessary. RDBury (talk) 18:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Or, what amounts to the same thing: redirect to tree (set theory) where the same concept is described more comprehensibly and with a little more context. Then delete the redirect per WP:CSD (ignoring the part of R3 that says it doesn't apply to articles converted into redirects) since the graph theory part is a misnomer and nobody's going to accidentally type it that way. It's a worthwhile concept to have some material in the encyclopedia about it, but this article doesn't really stand on its own. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Confusing article. It's definitely not a graph-related definition, and tree (set theory) seems to describe the same notion, but better explained. Pcap ping  03:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * delete and redirect to tree (set theory)-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 23:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.