Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brand24


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Participants have attained a consensus that the extent of sourcing available for this company does not meet WP:NCORP at this time, despite it being a listed company. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Brand24

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only one independent sigcov source, doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. A search for other sources only returns trivial/routine coverage. AlexandraAVX (talk) 13:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  14:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Internet,  and Poland. AlexandraAVX (talk) 13:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - still no indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – There seems to be a review on PCMag, but rest of the sources are just press releases, it seems. TLA  (talk) 04:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – Note: I am main author of this article. According to Notability (organizations and companies), publicly traded companies nearly always can be established as a notable. This was also my understanding while I was adding this article - it is about company that can be searched in multiple investing tools. In this short stub-article nearly all sentences are with references reliable sources, but I am happy to add more, if needed. Mlepicki (talk) 12:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Edit: Adding sample media coverage:
 * Business Insider - https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-review-all-marketing-partners-instagram-data-scraping-2019-8?IR=T
 * Wyborcza.pl, one of biggest newspapers in Poland: https://wyborcza.biz/biznes/7,177150,25313272,internety-robil-az-zablokowal-go-facebook-michal-sadowski.html
 * Polish edition of Newsweek: https://www.newsweek.pl/biznes/twarza-polskiego-biznesu-internetowego-jest-od-lat-wlasnie-debiutowal-na-gieldzie/5p031p4 Mlepicki (talk) 12:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Arbitrarily0   ( talk ) 02:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It is generally helpful for the readers to have articles on publicly listed companies, and while WP:ITSUSFUL is not enough, souces cited by the author above seem solid (ex. Gazeta Wyborcza is a major Polish newspaper). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Normally for listed companies we can locate detailed analyst reviews (which do more than report on stock price listings and forecasts and which analyse their business) which are a gold standard for notability but I cannot find anything for this company. The references posted by Mlepicki fails ORGIND as they rely entirely on information provided by the company and interviews with their execs with no "Independent Content" and fails CORPDEPTH and ORGIND.  HighKing++ 11:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with what's already been written. It fails GNG. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.