Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrandX.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

BrandX.com

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Company which fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH, the only coverage available consists of directory listings and routine announcements in unreliable trade publications. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails general notability. The two references are promotional interviews rather than independent significant coverage.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only references I can find the meet WP:ORGCRIT are ones about the individual brands and only mention the parent (BrandX) in passing as the owner. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.