Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brand ambassador


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:BEFORE. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Brand ambassador

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is just a neologism, info is already handled on some other article about spokespersons, branding or whatnot. Unsourced and unencyclopedic, with no reason to fix as info is already elsewhere. DreamGuy (talk) 23:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The tone gives this away as stealth spam: Non-traditional marketing companies utilize Brand Ambassadors in campaigns to answer questions, engage the audience, and increase brand awareness. Using reputable firm to supply this type of staff allows companies to maintain a high quality of applicants that mirror the target demographic to reach consumers in the most effective manner. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree that this is a non-notable neologism, and that the tone is spammish. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This is not a neologism as the words are well-established and, in any case, that not a reason to delete. The topic is highly notable as there are hundreds of books which discuss it.  No evidence has been presented as to the other articles which supposedly cover the same topic and no reason has been presented why we would not merge rather than delete.  Colonel Warden (talk) 17:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep on the basis of the sources the Colonel found--as he often does. Perhaps people should look BEFORE nominating. DGG (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per the usage indicated above. Eusebeus (talk) 15:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.