Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brand journalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Brand journalism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:NEO, basically. It's a term coined by one guy and popularised by one guy and the people who snarf his blog posts. Ironholds (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The content is a superficial rewrite of some of the sources. The topic lacks in-depth coverage in reliable, independent sources, and the phrase is a promotional coinage.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  22:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and Cullen. Basically, it's spam masquerading as lingo. Bearian (talk) 23:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Blah, blah, blah. Jargon-filled spam. Puffery for a fairly obvious "new" phrase for some fairly obvious old concepts. And (now that I've got that off my chest) no independent sourcing. --MelanieN (talk) 03:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.