Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branded tagging


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Branded tagging
Neologism coined by article author ten days ago. Original research. --Haakon 21:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not for things "coined by Peter S. Corbett on August, 5th, 2006."  &mdash;Cel ithemis  22:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I should write articles on stuff I coined on August 5, too. Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  23:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Peter S. Corbett's anally-extracted masterpiece --Xrblsnggt 02:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete. I removed my coinage reference. Now leave the article. &mdash;Cor bett3000 
 * Does your removal of attribution mean that the term has wider and prior documented use? Or was it still coined by you 11 days ago? Haakon 16:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How "wide" and how "prior" does a term need to be? Is there a policy on this? Regardless of when the term was coined, it is an actual PRACTICE that is occuring on a second by second basis on the web.  It is an important (or at least to advertising people) topic and the inclusion of an article in Wikipedia is part of a broader educational initive that needs to occur.  &mdash;Cor bett3000 
 * See Avoid_neologisms for some information on that. Haakon 15:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well played, Sir. Well played. &mdash;Cor bett3000 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.