Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandenburger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, but has also run its course, WP:HEY job done, copyvio problems sorted out. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Geschichte (talk) 08:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Brandenburger

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

None of the sources establish notability (one is AI generated), no recognition from any breed club, German article has no useful sources Traumnovelle (talk) 01:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep. listed in the International Encyclopedia of Horse Breeds, and described in Horses of the World, and Wissenswertes über Pferde, which notes, as French Wikipedia does, that the breed merged into the regionalized Deutsches Sportpferd, apparently in 2003, which is why you're not finding a current breed club or stud book, but notability is not temporary, and we don't have a Deutsches Sportpferd article yet anyways to use as a merge target.--Jahaza (talk) 04:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Currently most of the article had to be removed due to a copyright violation. Are you familiar enough with horse breeds to be able to rewrite the article based on reliable soures? Traumnovelle (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * In light of that I'll change my stance to neutral although the article is in a semi-incomplete status due to the copyright violation. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep, clearly notable even if now merged into another entity, the Deutsches Reitpferd. I've rewritten the page with ten solid sources after removing the foundational copyvio. A further nine links listed on the talk-page in 2008 seem to be fairly comprehensively dead. There are mentions (at least) in older sources such as this and this, but I can only get snippets so not enough to add them to the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Changing my stance to keep but I'd like for this to have a consensus reached before closing it. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, ! You can if you wish withdraw this, or indeed close it yourself – please see here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'd rather have it closed with a clear consensus for the record, although if it's better to withdraw I will do so. Traumnovelle (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.