Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branders.com (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Branders.com
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was named as one of the reasons why someone else's article was deleted (they've got one, we should too), but I can't really see much reason for this one. The referencing is poor, company site, venture capital finance profiles, crunchbase, dead links etc. There is little information about the company, and in particular what it actually does. Is it notable? Peridon (talk) 14:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Keep - There are plenty of independent sources. For example, I found 20 (non-PR-related) sources on HighBeam: Entrepreneur, Washington Post, Oakland Tribune, etc. - MrX 15:37, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The Entrepreneur article is just a press release and does not seem to be on Entrepreneur at all, the other two articles do not appear to be about the subject. One is about a political race. Are they linked correctly? --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:55, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Upon closer inspection, I think you are right. These are mostly press releases, advertorials and trivial mentions. I have revised my !vote. - MrX 22:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Similar page epromos.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.50.135.4 (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2013 (UTC)