Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Armstrong (dancer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sufficient sourcing exists that this isn't BLP/Delete territory. Can be renominated at a time you think more input is coming Star   Mississippi  02:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Brandon Armstrong (dancer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG, as coverage is trivial and merely reflects his behind-the-scenes role on DWTS. PK650 (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PK650 (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Background dancer, trivial coverage. He's more of a "grunt" on the show if that makes sense, just another employee. Oaktree b (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep It is true that he does not have an important role, but he is cited many times in People Magazine, ET and other entertainment publications. Some of the sources discuss him at length. I think that makes him pass WP:GNG   PaulPachad (talk) 02:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero  Parlez Moi 13:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Utah. Radioactive  (talk) 02:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Any instances you can show us of this "at length" coverage? PK650 (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.