Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Byrd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Brandon Byrd

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable actor with minimal credits. Corvus cornix talk  22:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I see that someone's taken advantage of the option at IMDB to pay to submit a resume. It's not that he has minimal credits; it's that he has NO credits.  Only contribution of a SPA.  Complete WP:BIO, WP:VAIN failure.   Ravenswing  18:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - There's very little in the way of career as he is just starting out. No body of work of significance.  No coverage in reliable sources.  No notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep No one has taken advantage of IMDB Resume. His page was established through his manager's IMDB pro account. If someone had taken advantage of IMDB Resume there would be a "View Resume" and "Official Photos" link under his name. If you look underneath the "Filmography" section on Brandon Byrd's Wikipedia page, you will see his list of credits for film and stage. Someone had falsely infringed upon his IMDB account by deleting his credits and moving them to Brandon Beard (I). IMDB is in the process of switching his credits back to where they belong. His film credits include "Time Expired (2010)" and "Real Steel (2011)," as shown under the filmography section in his Wikipedia page. Under marketability efforts of establishment into the entertainment industry an actor must establish their artist name when pursuing a career regardless of their position of where they are in their career. Look under the references and you will see credible sources from IMDB and International PR and Talent Management. Given the purpose of this, an artist who is set to be in public domain has by reasonably to be documented whereof in a database. Given this rule, any reasonable person may edit sentences and/or words containing bias remarks or gestures. Under the outlining situations, we cannot find coercive action to delete this page upon inaccurate accusations from bias remarks themselves for proposal of deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chittybang (talk • contribs) 21:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I recommend you familiarize yourself with WP:GNG, WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:NOTRESUME, three notability guidelines which apply to this case. Wikipedia is not a webhost or a social networking site, and Mr. Byrd has no inalienable right to be included on it. Beyond that, presuming that the subject is the same as this "Brandon Beard," one minor role in an (unreleased) indie flick and one extra role in another (likewise unreleased) movie doesn't come close to meeting the requirements of WP:ENTERTAINER. Finally, you are actually right in ascribing bias to the proponents of deletion; we are strongly biased in favor of upholding Wikipedia policies and guidelines, under which the subject fails of notability.   Ravenswing  22:02, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.