Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Hall (Miami University)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Brandon Hall (Miami University)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article gives no indication of why the subject is notable, and none of the sources are independent of the subject. A Google search has found no independent sources other than advertisements. (At most small portions of the information from the article could be included in Miami University and Edgar Ewing Brandon, if desired.) --Stfg (talk) 11:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Unless policy is to have an article on every public building. There does not seem to anything notable about this one, except of course to people who have lived in it. Kitfoxxe (talk) 06:05, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The closest thing I found to a source was this 2009 story about how they had won the Hall Cup. Which may be a great achievement, but doesn't give us reason to think it notable. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL - it is one of thousands of common, ordinary frat halls. Bearian (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Yup, I actually thought it was a person before I read it, but being a building gives it even less of a chance of meeting WP:GNG or any other notability guideline. Go   Phightins  !  02:37, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.