Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Jenkins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. alphachimp. 18:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Brandon Jenkins

 * — (View AfD)

As per a previous AfD, I am resubmitting this. This article fails WP:BIO and is related to Major League Gaming. :: Colin Keigher ( Talk ) 21:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nom.--Bryson 21:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO - and how can playing an electronic game gain one notariety? At all? SkierRMH 22:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Though I certainly tried, I could find no independent verification (via reliable sources) of any of Jenkins's achievements. -- Kicking222 16:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Technically, the nominator is saying HE is an AfD. Edison 01:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Edison 19:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Brandon Jenkins has been featured on MLG's Pro Circuit on USA Network. MLG is a very significant league - it offers the most prize money for its permanant games and has broadcasted shows on USA Network featuring every single player and team on the list. Most if not all players have had articles written about them in their local newspaper. EGM magazine - the most popular gaming magazine (you can get it in any of your local pharmacy stores) regularly feature MLG and its best teams and players. Wall Street Journal published an article about the first contract deal MLG offered to its top gamers.
 * Delete Subject has never appeared in any major international competition, nor has any notable achievements and therefore fails WP:BIO. For clarification regarding e-Sports, view e-Sports and 2006 e-Sports World Champions -- DJiTH 22:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.