Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Lemuel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Brandon Lemuel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems just like any other doctor; no significant claim of notability or coverage in third-party sources. Creator removed prod. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:02, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Flunks WP:BIO notability standards, looks like a promotional CV in violation of WP:NOTLINKEDIN. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 21:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability? Seems just like any other doctor - reads like an advert. Freedomlinux (talk) 22:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not a resume service. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. This is a chiropractor very inportent, he is one of the hundred Dr. to get the honer of the C.C.W.P worldwide, i will edit it and try to make it to your expecteacions. I am also trying to make the palmcare page, the line of clinics that Dr.Lemuel.Pedro thy master (talk) 9:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete relist when improved. -Falcon8765 (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Transparent vanity/promotion. JFW | T@lk  14:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. Looks like an important doctor to me so I think it be better to leave it how it is..Pedro the big boss (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Account blocked for sockpuppetry  Icestorm815  •  Talk  19:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. This seems a very notable Dr. and we dont have many chiropractors in this site, plus if you don not ike it edit it.PQMAM (talk) 13:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Account blocked for sockpuppetry  Icestorm815  •  Talk  19:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as obvious promo of non-notable chiropractor. The poor spelling is typical of many chiropractors, but this is so far out that it's likely a youthful admirer or child of the chiropractor.  Brangifer (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete The errors of spelling have been fixed and he is a very notable chiropractor.Pedro thy master (talk) 18:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete i have deleted the facebook and linkidin of the page so it is not in violation of WP:NOTLINKEDIN.Pedro thy master (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete i fixed and took off the page the vanity/promotion.User:Pedro thy Pedro thy master (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the work you're putting into this, but you're misunderstanding the basis for this proposal. The quality of the article isn't the issue; it's whether the subject himself merits mention in an encyclopedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * ESkog is right. Wikipedia is not to be misused for promotion. You are lucky you didn't get indef blocked for your sockpuppetry and you're still on very thin ice. I suggest you return to editing other matters. Right now you have already managed to give this particular chiropractor some bad publicity here by this attempt at promotion.  Brangifer (talk) 03:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry if you think i`m giving publicity, but to me it is not publicity i`m just doing an artical about a chiropractor, who is the owner, of a very good company, and i was planing to make an artical about the notable figurs in chiropractic, and don`t you dare to tell me what to edit, i now i`m in thin ice but it is my eleccion so leave me alone BullRangifer, i rather that ESkog tells me what he thinks, and thank you for at least saining thati have edit it ESkog, i will do anything for this artical to stay in wikipedia.  Pedro thy master (talk • contribs) 19:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * i will do anything for this artical to stay in wikipedia - this is the problem right here. If you have a personal interest in keeping this article around, you need to set that aside and try to see our point of view - not every doctor is worth mentioning in an encyclopedia, of course, and we feel that this guy misses that mark. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I don`t have personal feelings, and i see your point of view but see it from mine, he is a great doctor and i think he dose make the mark. Pedro thy master (talk • contribs) 21:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia operates according to community-consensus standards of notability. The fact that you consider this doctor notable does not make him notable for the purposes of this encyclopædia, and your insistent approach runs afoul of WP:MPOV, which you may want to read to understand why you're encountering such resistance here. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 22:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.