Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Nuw Crawford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Brandon Nuw Crawford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. No prima facie evidence of notability in the article (assuming "entrepreneur", "inventor", and "actor" don't automatically imply that they've achieved any significance in those areas). Almost no Google hits. Creator of non-notable websites. I submitted for speedy (and it had been speedily deleted shortly before being recreated) but another editor disagreed. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, none of this satisfies WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No claims to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * comment There are claims of notability, these claims may be exaggerated and may not meet WP:GNG but they are there. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me,  Stuff I've done )  07:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Have there been any conclusive discussions as to what "significance" means? I've been thinking of it as meaning a reason why one might even think there'd be an article on the topic. Personally, I don't consider "is an actor" any more a claim of significance than "is a lawyer" (really, even if one happens to have been on the screen, I resent that one thinks oneself more significant than I based solely on that fact), and I don't see starting a website as a sign of significance. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:15, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The argument is are his roles enough to pass WP:ENT. To say in a deletion discussion that there are "no claims to notability" is disingenuous. The article may fail notability guidelines and possibly be deleted, but let's be clear on why. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me,  Stuff I've done )  19:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources whatsoever. His body of work as an actor falls well short of what we would normally see for a notable actor, or producer.  There is no evidence that is endeavors as an entrepeneur / inventor have been noted. -- Whpq (talk) 16:29, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.