Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Patty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Brandon Patty

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems to fail WP:NPOL. Curbon7 (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete does not pass WP:NPOL and not otherwise notable. Mccapra (talk) 13:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sorely fails WP:NPOL. Zero notability shown. The fact that the subject worked for a few high-profile politicians does not pass down to the subject and does not count toward notability. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to pass WP:GNG, fails WP:NPOL also. Page created by an SPA. Mztourist (talk) 04:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test for politicians is holding an NPOL-passing office, not just running for one — but this features neither a credible claim to preexisting notability for other reasons independent of a candidacy, nor the depth and geographic range of sourcing needed to treat his candidacy as more special than everybody else's candidacies. Bearcat (talk) 01:54, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This guy did not even stand in the election, he dropped out before the primary. To be notable he would have actually needed to win the general election, which he did not do.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not pass WP:GNG, fails WP:NPOL. Politicians must get elected to warrant an article. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  10:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.