Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Wardell (comedy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Notability appears borderline, and a renomination is conceivable if new material does not appear.  Sandstein  09:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Brandon Wardell (comedy)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. It's an article about a comedian without any TV credits, presumably written by the comedian himself as self-promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeregal (talk • contribs)


 * Keep - Added filmography to article. Subject has one TV credit and is to work on more TV this year (Citation 14). This comedian's main medium is stand-up and not TV, and should be judged as such. Notability: significant news coverage (Vice, Washington Post), worked with multiple notable comedians such as Bob Odenkirk and Bo Burnham, and has performed at notable venues including San Diego Comic-Con 2015. Also, it's unlikely Wardell wrote this about himself; the article was created in January, but the first time he expresses knowledge of it (and brags) is 12 July 2015 on his Twitter account. - Substantial Contributor Bollsaurus (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 15.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - I feel his notability is marginal at best, and "is to work on more TV this year" is almost the slogan for WP:TOOSOON, but I think there's enough verifiable stuff here that it can pass. The fact that his fans are vandalising the page due to it hitting Twitter is neither here nor there for notability, and is probably a temporary problem, but I'll watch the page anyway. --Slashme (talk) 05:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Draft and userfy as a compromise as some of this may be acceptable but I think it could be better with my searches finding the expected results here, here and here. SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd be perfectly happy with that result. --Slashme (talk) 06:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 04:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Userfy - as this is currently WP:TOOSOON.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.