Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Woelfel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Brandon Woelfel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet general notability guidelines - sources are not independent. I've found some additional sources as well, but those that discuss the subject in depth are are mostly blogs, etc. - not reliable sources. Article was denied at AFC, but author immediately moved it to mainspace despite this. Jmertel23 (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Jmertel23 (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Most of the information in the article can be traced back to his podcast with Creative Rebels or information on Skillshare’s website (not a blog). He is one of the most influential photographers in today’s world, up there with Chase Jarvis and Scott Kelby. Abobeck11 (talk) 18:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I already put this up for PROD for the same reasons as this nominator, but it was declined. Mccapra (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks significant coverage by independent sources, fails GNG --DannyS712 (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The fact that the living people category is still growing at about 1,000 a week is a sign we need to do something about all these new articles on non-notable people. That is net growth, so absolute growth of the living people categiry is even bigger since deaths and deletions take some articles away, as well as edits when unrecorded deaths from years ago are discovered.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.