Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandt Russo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Brandt Russo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Borderline notability bio / attack / which was created by an SPA and declined speedy by another potential SPA with a few extra edits (including other speedy declines). I have done some work to clean up and reference, but this seems to be a magnet for vandalism and -BLP comments by multiple IPs, as well as by the original author  7  07:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

http://adventure.wrecked.org/?filename=homeless-jesus&redirected=wreckedfortheordinary.com http://www.enochmagazine.com/articles/general/brandt-russo-interview-pt-1 http://www.thevoicemagazine.com/blog/breaking-news/what-does-brandt-russo-have-in-common-with-todd-bentley/ http://www.nhne.org/news/NewsArticlesArchive/tabid/400/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5739/language/en-US/Brandt-Russo-Trying-To-Live-Like-Jesus.aspx too bad I don't know how to list them as sources, edit the article, or insert citations for any of them. I think, though, that if you're only talking about deleting the article because notability hasn't been established, then I've given you enough here to prove that Brandt Russo is in fact notable98.199.105.39 (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * keep I don't know how wikipedia works as far as editing and code but I know these links ought to help with establishing notability:

i was trying to accommodate all of the rules and didn't think what i was typing was incorrect. i even used the word allegedly. anyway, i don't feel that any of my information is incorrect. in fact, everything was referenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.44.135 (talk) 07:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete without better sourcing for notability. The only thing that loks like a claim to notability ("he was well-known in Christian circles for his ministry among the homeless in various cities") is sourced to his own web page. Hairhorn (talk) 12:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, the links provided above are not reliable sources. Woogee (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the sources appear to be mere news items or self-published. Essentially a one-man protest movement, operating by seeking notoriety, but that is only what I judge by reading the article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, but NB: there is minor news coverage; we've deleted people more notable and kept articles of bios of people less notable. I side on the WP:NOT of the divide, but I would imagine there would be inclusionists that could construct a sourced Frankenstein of an article from existing sources. THF (talk) 14:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.